Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: micah6vs8 Date: Jul 20, 2013 6:50pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Non-Dead ... not a bad setlist for Sir Paul

I think the show time is still just short of two hours- and that's without a second between songs. Reminds me of...

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Diamondhead Date: Jul 20, 2013 10:19pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Non-Dead ... not a bad setlist for Sir Paul

Not the Dead. 6/22/74 in Vancouver. 33 songs, 3 1/2 hours, 2 pee breaks, and a short nap.

Um, Elvis Costello? I once saw him in Berkeley in the late '70s when he was still an angry young man. 45-50 minutes and out the door. It was so intense you wanted to go out and turn over a car or something when you left the aud.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: bluedevil Date: Jul 21, 2013 12:31am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Non-Dead ... not a bad setlist for Sir Paul

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQbQ2InHp44

He's still releasing great stuff, but those first few releases are still in heavy rotations. Hell, Almost Blue turned me on to George Jones more than Bob's lame excuse of The Race is On.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Diamondhead Date: Jul 21, 2013 12:43pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Non-Dead ... not a bad setlist for Sir Paul

There's just too much music in the world to keep up. I did happen to catch a live show he did with the Attractions on cable recently and it was great. I was amazed that he is as good a guitarist as he is. I never knew that.

Right now my son is teaching me about Frank Ocean. :)

Terms of Use (31 Dec 2014)